CHAPTER 12 Grasping the IR Evolution
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36
The difference between traditional IR and this book’s view of IR is the difference
between hope and control. Both approaches incorporate basic IR
functions, but traditional IR more than the present approach hangs its hat
on chance. In other words, the approach advocated here gives the dice to the
high rollers and bets with the house. Part IV shares several specific strategies
that IR should employ to mitigate risk and position the company to maximize
valuation.
Any company that does not approach the IR function as critical and
strategic is not acting in the best interest of its shareholders. Now, of course,
some smaller companies are so focused on their bottom lines that they refuse
to believe they can afford a sophisticated IR effort. Yet these same companies
have armies of lawyers, consultants, and accountants. IR is right up
there with those professional service providers and equally, if not more, important
as it relates to valuation issues.
Accordingly, the cost of any IR effort, no matter how sophisticated, is
nominal relative to the prospect of damaging the company’s valuation by
even one multiple point—a penalty that would, for example, translate to
$50 million of value for a company with 50 million shares outstanding.
OUT WITH THE OLD
The stakes are extremely high in corporate America today, and the payoff
can be equally great. That’s why every company, big and small, public and
private, needs to infuse a more sophisticated approach to their IR programs.
The new IR is a voice to and from the stock market, interpreting
the signposts, negotiating the hazards, and picking the best routes (see
Table 12.1).
TABLE 12.1 The New IR
Traditional IR New Approach
Strategy Supports strategy and makes sure it’s Helps create strategy, with the benefit
communicated to the key players. of understanding its impact on the
markets.
Story Crafts and communicates an investment Crafts, communicates and helps create
thesis based in operations and marketing a complete investment thesis that
strategies. Built from the executives’ hinges on valuation. Shuns promotion.
perspectives, sales-oriented. (See box on Dress Best Shops.)
Stock market reconnaissance Maintains a dutiful eye on the stock Understands valuation and daily market
market. volatility. Can discern if fluctuations are
are due to buy-sell imbalances, or
correlated to the underlying
fundamentals of a logical peer group.
Shareholder analysis Tracks stock ownership, names, and Tracks investors. Also creates investors
amounts, through any number of by looking at multiple comp groups
available databases and resources. based on size, business model
characteristics, balance-sheet strength
and valuation.
Approaching analysts Knows the value of analysts, but often Makes sure that guidance is set
approaches them qualitatively. conservatively and the story is
“packaged” properly before
approaching anyone. Mitigates risk.
Grasping the IR Revolution 81
TABLE 12.1 (continued)
Traditional IR New Approach
Feedback Considers feedback an important part of Has peer reltaionships with bankers,
the job. Success is based on peer analysts, and portfolio managers. Those
relationships in the capital markets relationships are driven off the ability
which may or may not exist. to talk valuation.
The CEO Supports the CEO, helps senior Provides senior, strategic, peer counsel
management sell the company strategy, to the CEO. Both cheerleader and
and provides information from The devil’s advocate. Coaches the ego out of
Street and the market as they know it. management. Comes in at strategy
creation to advise on best possible
choice for shareholders, and helps the
board quantify decisions and educate
The Street.
Managing the event Reactive, at least from an analyst’s Creates the company story and defines
perspective. Lacks experience or it with analysts before anyone has a
information to be proactive. chance to write it. Specific, conservative
guidance to control, in as much as
possible, the variables. Sophisticated
targeting to attract new buy-side and
sell-side blood.
TABLE 12.1 (continued)
Traditional IR New Approach
Smaller caps N/A Knows no public company can ignore
Some micro caps, small caps, and mid- IR. Uses conference calls and other
caps conduct IR as an afterthought. cost-effective strategies to enhance a
When regulations were more lax, did company’s multiple, which can mean
little more than bare necessities, such as millions of dollars for company value
SEC disclosures and annual meetings. as well as other benefits that far
outweigh the cost.
Private companies N/A Knows that a voice in the industry is
Most private companies do not have invaluable and that analysts are still the
formal IR programs because they don’t best road to validation and awareness.
publicly trade equity or debt and don’t Helps define and distinguish offering
have to report to anyone outside of the to advance agendas, such as
company. distribution, promotion, or financing,
to gain competitive edge.
TRANSFORMING IR
IR cannot be only an administrative function. It needs to work strategically,
report directly to the CEO and CFO, and insiuate itself into the practices
and strategies of the company. IR in many cases should be equally, if not
more, savvy with regard to the capital markets than the CEO or CFO, and
should constantly be on the lookout for anything that could damage or enhance
valuation. IR worries about the stock; the CEO should worry about
the business.
IR offers more than a plan, comments, or insights, it offers a tactical description
of how to get things done, how to achieve the desired result. IR
works through each quarter to support the decisions of senior management
and to qualitatively and quantitatively convey the story of these decisions to
all stakeholders.
IR should be management’s confidant, value detective, ear to the street,
bridge to the industry, strategic advisor, and insurance policy, much like out-
Finding the Company Story
Dress Best Shops is a retailer that experienced four quarters of terrible
same store sales results. The stock had gone from $20 a share to $13
and was on course to earn $1 per share in 2004. Management pulled
inward, refusing to talk to The Street, because it felt that it had no story
to tell. Over time the company had done well, but at this point, they
were opening stores at a slower pace and they weren’t quite sure why
their sales were poor.
It just so happens that the stock was trading at 13x the $1 earnings
estimate for 2004. This was in-line with other retailers, but they had
$11 per share in cash on their balance sheet. Wall Street was thus valuing
the operating company at $2 per share or 2x forward earnings, literally
a risk-free situation on par with a Treasury Bond. Plus, the company
had a great dividend and the opportunity existed for significant
equity appreciation over the next two to three years.
Contrary to management’s belief, Dress Best Shops was a very exciting
investment opportunity. The lack of risk made it a perfect situation
to get analyst coverage, as well as buy-side interest. And that’s exactly
what happened, in that order, because good IR is always
economic to the sell-side first. After they publish, and get the credit, the
buy-side gets involved.
sourced legal and accounting. Capital markets and public relations professionals
with experience on the other side of the table are a good start to executing
the new IR.
To paraphrase a line from Sean Connery’s character in the movie The
Untouchables, implementing and executing a strategic IR strategy without a
capital markets background is like “bringing a knife to a gunfight.” In order
to maximize equity value, companies must have intelligence and understanding
of the market, transparency, a comprehensive long-term plan, and
the management credibility and financial performance to bring in results.
Strategic IR is a critical cog in this process and if done correctly can add
another trusted and valuable management leg to the stool. The management
team and the public company are the product, and IR packages that product
for Wall Street consumption.
The difference between traditional IR and this book’s view of IR is the difference
between hope and control. Both approaches incorporate basic IR
functions, but traditional IR more than the present approach hangs its hat
on chance. In other words, the approach advocated here gives the dice to the
high rollers and bets with the house. Part IV shares several specific strategies
that IR should employ to mitigate risk and position the company to maximize
valuation.
Any company that does not approach the IR function as critical and
strategic is not acting in the best interest of its shareholders. Now, of course,
some smaller companies are so focused on their bottom lines that they refuse
to believe they can afford a sophisticated IR effort. Yet these same companies
have armies of lawyers, consultants, and accountants. IR is right up
there with those professional service providers and equally, if not more, important
as it relates to valuation issues.
Accordingly, the cost of any IR effort, no matter how sophisticated, is
nominal relative to the prospect of damaging the company’s valuation by
even one multiple point—a penalty that would, for example, translate to
$50 million of value for a company with 50 million shares outstanding.
OUT WITH THE OLD
The stakes are extremely high in corporate America today, and the payoff
can be equally great. That’s why every company, big and small, public and
private, needs to infuse a more sophisticated approach to their IR programs.
The new IR is a voice to and from the stock market, interpreting
the signposts, negotiating the hazards, and picking the best routes (see
Table 12.1).
TABLE 12.1 The New IR
Traditional IR New Approach
Strategy Supports strategy and makes sure it’s Helps create strategy, with the benefit
communicated to the key players. of understanding its impact on the
markets.
Story Crafts and communicates an investment Crafts, communicates and helps create
thesis based in operations and marketing a complete investment thesis that
strategies. Built from the executives’ hinges on valuation. Shuns promotion.
perspectives, sales-oriented. (See box on Dress Best Shops.)
Stock market reconnaissance Maintains a dutiful eye on the stock Understands valuation and daily market
market. volatility. Can discern if fluctuations are
are due to buy-sell imbalances, or
correlated to the underlying
fundamentals of a logical peer group.
Shareholder analysis Tracks stock ownership, names, and Tracks investors. Also creates investors
amounts, through any number of by looking at multiple comp groups
available databases and resources. based on size, business model
characteristics, balance-sheet strength
and valuation.
Approaching analysts Knows the value of analysts, but often Makes sure that guidance is set
approaches them qualitatively. conservatively and the story is
“packaged” properly before
approaching anyone. Mitigates risk.
Grasping the IR Revolution 81
TABLE 12.1 (continued)
Traditional IR New Approach
Feedback Considers feedback an important part of Has peer reltaionships with bankers,
the job. Success is based on peer analysts, and portfolio managers. Those
relationships in the capital markets relationships are driven off the ability
which may or may not exist. to talk valuation.
The CEO Supports the CEO, helps senior Provides senior, strategic, peer counsel
management sell the company strategy, to the CEO. Both cheerleader and
and provides information from The devil’s advocate. Coaches the ego out of
Street and the market as they know it. management. Comes in at strategy
creation to advise on best possible
choice for shareholders, and helps the
board quantify decisions and educate
The Street.
Managing the event Reactive, at least from an analyst’s Creates the company story and defines
perspective. Lacks experience or it with analysts before anyone has a
information to be proactive. chance to write it. Specific, conservative
guidance to control, in as much as
possible, the variables. Sophisticated
targeting to attract new buy-side and
sell-side blood.
TABLE 12.1 (continued)
Traditional IR New Approach
Smaller caps N/A Knows no public company can ignore
Some micro caps, small caps, and mid- IR. Uses conference calls and other
caps conduct IR as an afterthought. cost-effective strategies to enhance a
When regulations were more lax, did company’s multiple, which can mean
little more than bare necessities, such as millions of dollars for company value
SEC disclosures and annual meetings. as well as other benefits that far
outweigh the cost.
Private companies N/A Knows that a voice in the industry is
Most private companies do not have invaluable and that analysts are still the
formal IR programs because they don’t best road to validation and awareness.
publicly trade equity or debt and don’t Helps define and distinguish offering
have to report to anyone outside of the to advance agendas, such as
company. distribution, promotion, or financing,
to gain competitive edge.
TRANSFORMING IR
IR cannot be only an administrative function. It needs to work strategically,
report directly to the CEO and CFO, and insiuate itself into the practices
and strategies of the company. IR in many cases should be equally, if not
more, savvy with regard to the capital markets than the CEO or CFO, and
should constantly be on the lookout for anything that could damage or enhance
valuation. IR worries about the stock; the CEO should worry about
the business.
IR offers more than a plan, comments, or insights, it offers a tactical description
of how to get things done, how to achieve the desired result. IR
works through each quarter to support the decisions of senior management
and to qualitatively and quantitatively convey the story of these decisions to
all stakeholders.
IR should be management’s confidant, value detective, ear to the street,
bridge to the industry, strategic advisor, and insurance policy, much like out-
Finding the Company Story
Dress Best Shops is a retailer that experienced four quarters of terrible
same store sales results. The stock had gone from $20 a share to $13
and was on course to earn $1 per share in 2004. Management pulled
inward, refusing to talk to The Street, because it felt that it had no story
to tell. Over time the company had done well, but at this point, they
were opening stores at a slower pace and they weren’t quite sure why
their sales were poor.
It just so happens that the stock was trading at 13x the $1 earnings
estimate for 2004. This was in-line with other retailers, but they had
$11 per share in cash on their balance sheet. Wall Street was thus valuing
the operating company at $2 per share or 2x forward earnings, literally
a risk-free situation on par with a Treasury Bond. Plus, the company
had a great dividend and the opportunity existed for significant
equity appreciation over the next two to three years.
Contrary to management’s belief, Dress Best Shops was a very exciting
investment opportunity. The lack of risk made it a perfect situation
to get analyst coverage, as well as buy-side interest. And that’s exactly
what happened, in that order, because good IR is always
economic to the sell-side first. After they publish, and get the credit, the
buy-side gets involved.
sourced legal and accounting. Capital markets and public relations professionals
with experience on the other side of the table are a good start to executing
the new IR.
To paraphrase a line from Sean Connery’s character in the movie The
Untouchables, implementing and executing a strategic IR strategy without a
capital markets background is like “bringing a knife to a gunfight.” In order
to maximize equity value, companies must have intelligence and understanding
of the market, transparency, a comprehensive long-term plan, and
the management credibility and financial performance to bring in results.
Strategic IR is a critical cog in this process and if done correctly can add
another trusted and valuable management leg to the stool. The management
team and the public company are the product, and IR packages that product
for Wall Street consumption.