Secret 6THOSE WHO USE CRYSTAL BALLS EAT CHIPPED GLASS
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128
“It is not for us to forecast the future but to shape it.”
— Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Every one tries to beat the market by trying to predict the
future. The problem is that 90% of all investors are horrible failures
at trying to predict short term moves in stocks, indexes and
futures. Even the professional shows a dismal record.
Study after study shows that 80% to 90% of the stock mutual
funds underperform the indexes and stock market averages
year after year. This means that investing in an Index Fund where
no management is involved is wiser than investing in a mutual
fund of stocks. There is no need to pay those management fees.
This also tells you that future stock price actions are unpredictable.
When the pros, who are paid hefty salaries, can’t beat
the averages, who can?`
In fact, the brokerage firms spend millions and millions of
dollars trying to find systems that will predict future stock and
commodity prices, and their results have not been good. Some of
our top scientists spent millions of dollars trying to develop a system
for predicting stock prices and were unsuccessful. (However,
they were able, after extensive research and testing, to develop a
system to predict index prices. Check out the book, The Predictors
by Thomas A. Bass.)
Hence, there are no crystal balls for predicting the markets.
Academic studies strongly suggest that the markets move randomly
( Check out A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton
G. Malkiel, now in its 8th edition.) And, if the top brains and specialists,
backed by millions of dollars, can’t beat or predict stock
movements, why should you be able to do so? Therefore, the best
way to approach the markets is to assume that they are random.
Many investors that I have encountered have a totally irrational
view of their ability to predict the market. On numerous occasions,
investors have asserted that they were 99% sure that the
market would move up or down, and most of the time they have
been wrong. In fact, some have become angry when I say that the
markets approach randomness.
The problem that all investors face is that the markets are
very efficient. That means that they have digested and discounted all the information that is available and, thus, have discounted
present trends and potential future events.
Furthermore, in this information age of the internet, this
discounting occurs very rapidly. For example, the stock market
moves six months before events occur, such as a recession bottom.
Consequently, almost all future price moves are based on
surprise news and events not available to the public.
As for trend followers, trends can be changed radically by
chaos theory , which states that small unrelated events can have
a major impact on future events or trends. Therefore, it is best to
assume the markets are random, rather than try to predict and
bet on the unpredictable.
The big advantage to options is that you don’t need a crystal
ball. In fact, you don’t have to be right about the market 50% of
the time. Some option strategies win 90% of the time regardless
of what the market does. If you are an option buyer, one winner
can pay for many losses. As a result, you can be wrong about the
market most of the time and still be a winner.
In my Complete Option Report, when making recommendations
over seventeen years, I assumed that the markets were random.
We always recommended three puts and three calls for
purchase in each issue. Even with this random approach, the options
theoretical portfolio showed impressive returns over that
period.
So, throw out your crystal ball and trade options!
“It is not for us to forecast the future but to shape it.”
— Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Every one tries to beat the market by trying to predict the
future. The problem is that 90% of all investors are horrible failures
at trying to predict short term moves in stocks, indexes and
futures. Even the professional shows a dismal record.
Study after study shows that 80% to 90% of the stock mutual
funds underperform the indexes and stock market averages
year after year. This means that investing in an Index Fund where
no management is involved is wiser than investing in a mutual
fund of stocks. There is no need to pay those management fees.
This also tells you that future stock price actions are unpredictable.
When the pros, who are paid hefty salaries, can’t beat
the averages, who can?`
In fact, the brokerage firms spend millions and millions of
dollars trying to find systems that will predict future stock and
commodity prices, and their results have not been good. Some of
our top scientists spent millions of dollars trying to develop a system
for predicting stock prices and were unsuccessful. (However,
they were able, after extensive research and testing, to develop a
system to predict index prices. Check out the book, The Predictors
by Thomas A. Bass.)
Hence, there are no crystal balls for predicting the markets.
Academic studies strongly suggest that the markets move randomly
( Check out A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton
G. Malkiel, now in its 8th edition.) And, if the top brains and specialists,
backed by millions of dollars, can’t beat or predict stock
movements, why should you be able to do so? Therefore, the best
way to approach the markets is to assume that they are random.
Many investors that I have encountered have a totally irrational
view of their ability to predict the market. On numerous occasions,
investors have asserted that they were 99% sure that the
market would move up or down, and most of the time they have
been wrong. In fact, some have become angry when I say that the
markets approach randomness.
The problem that all investors face is that the markets are
very efficient. That means that they have digested and discounted all the information that is available and, thus, have discounted
present trends and potential future events.
Furthermore, in this information age of the internet, this
discounting occurs very rapidly. For example, the stock market
moves six months before events occur, such as a recession bottom.
Consequently, almost all future price moves are based on
surprise news and events not available to the public.
As for trend followers, trends can be changed radically by
chaos theory , which states that small unrelated events can have
a major impact on future events or trends. Therefore, it is best to
assume the markets are random, rather than try to predict and
bet on the unpredictable.
The big advantage to options is that you don’t need a crystal
ball. In fact, you don’t have to be right about the market 50% of
the time. Some option strategies win 90% of the time regardless
of what the market does. If you are an option buyer, one winner
can pay for many losses. As a result, you can be wrong about the
market most of the time and still be a winner.
In my Complete Option Report, when making recommendations
over seventeen years, I assumed that the markets were random.
We always recommended three puts and three calls for
purchase in each issue. Even with this random approach, the options
theoretical portfolio showed impressive returns over that
period.
So, throw out your crystal ball and trade options!