Secret 44 PROBABILITY—THE FIRST SECRET FOR OPTION WRITERS
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128
From my experience the secret to winning at the naked option
writing game is to find very high probability plays. I write
naked options for speculation that have a very high probability of
paying off. With software that is now available (i.e. Option Master
®), you can measure the probability of a successful play.
Whenever you write naked options, you must use a stop-loss
to survive. I use a stop-loss based on the underlying stock, index
or futures, But even better, using a simulator, you can determine
the probability of hitting the stop-loss during the life of the
option.
I am always in search of a sure thing. Whenever the probability
of success is greater than 90%, I have a potential play. The
key to finding high probability plays is to write far-out-of-themoney
options. My best play was a Cell Pathways (CLPA) 7.50 put
priced at 1 ($100) with about 2 1/2 months before expiration, but
the underlying stock was priced at 48, a country mile from the
strike price. There was no reason to run the simulator, for the
probability of hitting 7.50 would have been 0.
However, a word of caution here. When an option is extremely
overpriced or extremely underpriced, there is probably a
reason. In fact, ironically, buying and selling stocks based on this
premise can be a profitable venture.
Here there was a reason; Cell Pathways, a drug company,
had a drug that was coming up for FDA review. However, after a
review of the price chart for CLPA, I found a lot of support at 10,
and I probably would abort or get out with a small loss if it hit 10.
The worst case scenario would be that I would get the stock
for a price of 6.50. (The put buyer has the right to put the stock
to the writer at 7.50, but I already had 1 point in my pocket, so
my cost is 6.50.) Even if CLPA were to go bankrupt without letting
me out of the position, an unlikely scenario, my maximum
loss would be 6.50. Here, I thought I had found a slam dunk play.
The extremely overpriced puts were a good signal that the
stock would decline, and it did down to 15 from 48, but that still was far from the strike price of the puts that I had written. I had
an easy win as I predicted.
You see, the option writers who write out-of-the-money options
have two factors going for them: time and distance. To get
writers in trouble, the underlying price must move against them
fast enough to beat the expiration date and far enough to hit
their stop-loss or strike price, sometimes an almost impossible
task.
From my experience the secret to winning at the naked option
writing game is to find very high probability plays. I write
naked options for speculation that have a very high probability of
paying off. With software that is now available (i.e. Option Master
®), you can measure the probability of a successful play.
Whenever you write naked options, you must use a stop-loss
to survive. I use a stop-loss based on the underlying stock, index
or futures, But even better, using a simulator, you can determine
the probability of hitting the stop-loss during the life of the
option.
I am always in search of a sure thing. Whenever the probability
of success is greater than 90%, I have a potential play. The
key to finding high probability plays is to write far-out-of-themoney
options. My best play was a Cell Pathways (CLPA) 7.50 put
priced at 1 ($100) with about 2 1/2 months before expiration, but
the underlying stock was priced at 48, a country mile from the
strike price. There was no reason to run the simulator, for the
probability of hitting 7.50 would have been 0.
However, a word of caution here. When an option is extremely
overpriced or extremely underpriced, there is probably a
reason. In fact, ironically, buying and selling stocks based on this
premise can be a profitable venture.
Here there was a reason; Cell Pathways, a drug company,
had a drug that was coming up for FDA review. However, after a
review of the price chart for CLPA, I found a lot of support at 10,
and I probably would abort or get out with a small loss if it hit 10.
The worst case scenario would be that I would get the stock
for a price of 6.50. (The put buyer has the right to put the stock
to the writer at 7.50, but I already had 1 point in my pocket, so
my cost is 6.50.) Even if CLPA were to go bankrupt without letting
me out of the position, an unlikely scenario, my maximum
loss would be 6.50. Here, I thought I had found a slam dunk play.
The extremely overpriced puts were a good signal that the
stock would decline, and it did down to 15 from 48, but that still was far from the strike price of the puts that I had written. I had
an easy win as I predicted.
You see, the option writers who write out-of-the-money options
have two factors going for them: time and distance. To get
writers in trouble, the underlying price must move against them
fast enough to beat the expiration date and far enough to hit
their stop-loss or strike price, sometimes an almost impossible
task.