4.1 Genetic Variability and Natural Selection
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
In the next chapter, I show how scenario visualization fi ts into the evolutionary
psychologist’s schematization of the mind to form a more complete
picture of how it is that humans evolved the ability to solve
vision-related problems creatively. In this chapter, I trace the evolution of
the visual system beginning with organisms that developed a light/dark
sensitivity area and culminating in the complex activities involved in an
aspect of conscious cognitive visual processing that I call scenario visualization.
I do this utilizing the anatomical evidence from fossils and living
species thought to be homologous to ancient species. I also use evidence
from ancient toolmaking techniques because, in my estimation, the evolution
of tool types parallels the evolution from noncognitive visual processing,
through cognitive visual processing, to scenario visualization, a form
of conscious cognitive visual processing (also see Arp, 2006, 2007a, 2008c).
The variety and complexity of tools discovered and dated by archeologists
offer compelling evidence that the brain and visual system have evolved
with the passage of time. Before tracing the evolution of the visual system,
I fi rst must say something about the general evolutionary principles of
genetic variability and natural selection.
As was noted in the last section of the previous chapter, neural development
is dependent upon genetic and environmental factors. Even though
neurulation follows a genetic blueprint, the way in which neurons differentiate,
localize, and ultimately perform depends upon the internal chemiconeural
environment of nervous system processes as well as the interaction
between the nervous system and the external environment. This neurobiological
process is representative of the general evolutionary pattern that all
processes of organisms follow. The evolutionary pattern consists of genetic variability and the natural selection of traits that are most fi t given a particular
environment.
Darwin’s (1859) insights concerning evolution—ones that still hold
today—are the following: (1) there is variation in organisms such that they
differ from each other in ways that are inherited; (2) there is a struggle or
competition for existence, since more organisms are born than can survive;
(3) there is a natural selection of the traits that are most fi t given a particular
environment; (4) organisms fortunate enough to have the variation in
traits that fi t a particular environment will have an increased chance of
surviving to pass those traits on to their progeny; and (5) natural selection
leads to the accumulation of favored variants, which may produce new
species or a segregated gene pool, given the right environmental conditions
and a certain amount of time.
Since Darwin’s time, we have been able to determine that a major source
of variation in organisms has to do with genetic mutation. A gene is a
functional segment of DNA located at a particular site on a chromosome
in the nucleus of all cells. Basically, DNA is the template from which RNA
copies are made that transmits genetic information concerning an organism’s
physical and behavioral traits (phenotypic traits) to synthesis sites in
the cytoplasm of the cell. RNA takes this information to ribosomes in a
cell where amino acids, and then proteins, are formed according to that
information. The proteins are the so-called building blocks of life, since they
ultimately determine the physical characteristics of organisms (Carroll,
2005; Audesirk et al., 2002; Strickberger, 1985, 2000; Dawkins, 1986; Mayr,
2001; Ruse, 2000; also see the relevant papers in Arp & Rosenberg, 2008;
Arp & Ayala, 2008).
DNA and RNA are composed of nucleic acids. These nucleic acids specify
the amino-acid sequences of all the proteins needed to make up the physical
characteristics of an organism, much like a code or cryptogram. This
code consists of specifi c sequences of nucleotides that are composed of a
sugar (deoxyribose in DNA, ribose in RNA), a phosphate group, and one
of four different nitrogen-containing bases, namely, adenine, guanine,
cytosine, and thymine in DNA (uracil replaces thymine in RNA). These
four bases are like a four-letter alphabet, and triplets of bases form threeletter
words or codons that identify an amino acid or signal a function.
There are 64 possible permutations of the four bases, and if one of the
nucleotides in a sequence is either deleted or substituted, or if an alternate
nucleotide is inserted, then a mutation is said to occur. A mutation is
nothing other than an alteration in the nucleotide sequence of a DNA or
RNA molecule. Mutations can result from a variety of environmental
The Evolution of the Visual System and Scenario Visualization 93
sources, including certain chemicals, radiation from X rays, and ultraviolet
rays in sunlight. Mutations also can occur spontaneously. However, the
most common source of mutations occurs regularly in base pairing during
replication, as a cell prepares for cell division. In other words, mutations
are occurring all of the time, since cell division is occurring in organisms
all of the time.
Now, the genetic makeup of an organism directly affects its phenotypic
characteristics. Whether an animal will have all of its limbs, or be stronger
than another member of its species, or look more appealing to the opposite
sex—all of these phenotypic characteristics are under genetic control
(Carroll, 2005; Strickberger, 1985, 2000; Mayr, 2001; Lewontin, 1992). The
examples of the manipulations of HOX genes that result in monstrous
animal forms I spoke about in the last section of the previous chapter
should make this point clear.
When an organism exists in a particular environment, the chance of it
being naturally selected to survive depends upon whether its genetic
makeup happened to have produced the phenotypic characteristics necessary
for optimal survival in that particular environment. To a certain
extent, the randomness of a mutation makes the business of life a “crapshoot.”
If your wolf genes coded you to have three legs instead of four,
then it is likely you will not survive in the wolf pack out in the forests of
Colorado. And if your rabbit genes coded you to have poor eyesight, then
it is likely you will not survive in the same forests of Colorado, where your
eyesight is essential for avoiding such packs of wolves. The phenotypic
effects of mutations need only be slight so that, for example, one wolf may
be just a little stronger, or a little faster, or a little more aggressive than
the rest of the pack. This small genotypic variation leads to a slight phenotypic
benefi t, giving the wolf an advantage in hunting, mating, and
passing its genes on to future generations.
Natural selection is a mechanism of evolution by which the environment
favors the reproductive success of individuals possessing desirable genetic
variants with greater phenotypic fi tness, increasing the chance that those
genotypes for the phenotypic traits will predominate in succeeding generations.
The evolutionary principles of genetic variation and the natural
selection of the traits most fi t in a particular environment are illustrated
in fi gure 4.1. This illustration owes its genesis to productive conversations
with my graduate school colleague at Saint Louis University, Kevin Decker,
as well as with biologists such as Robert Wood, at Saint Louis University,
and Charles Granger, at the University of Missouri—St. Louis. In this fi gure,
I try to show how natural selection acts like a sieve that allows for a certain phenotypic characteristic to pass through to a subsequent generation. The
various shapes represent organisms having certain phenotypic traits that
are genetically controlled. The sieves themselves (the rectangular planes)
represent the certain environments in which these organisms live. The
preformed slot or hole represents the optimal survival of organisms possessing
a desirable phenotypic trait in that particular environment.
The point of this illustration is to represent pictorially what biologists
such as Audesirk et al. (2002) and Berra (1990) have claimed about genetic
variability and natural selection. According to Audesirk et al. (2002, p. 175):
“Mutations are essential for evolution, because these random changes in
DNA sequence are the ultimate source of all genetic variation. New base
Figure 4.1
The evolutionary sieve
Generic Variants
Environment A:
The square was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
Environment B:
The rhombus was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
Environment C:
The triangle was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
sequences undergo natural selection as organisms compete to survive and
reproduce. Occasionally, a mutation proves benefi cial in the organism’s
interactions with its environment. The mutant base sequence may spread
throughout the population and become common as organisms that possess
it outcompete rivals that bear the original, unmutated base sequence.” In
Berra’s (1990, p. 8) words: “Some genetic variants will be better adapted to
their environment than others of their sort, and will therefore tend to
survive to maturity and to leave more offspring than will organisms with
less favorable variations. . . . The environment is the selecting agent, and
because the environment changes over time and from one region to
another, different variants will be selected under different environmental
conditions.”
Stated simply, the various species around us today are those organisms
that have made it through one of these environmental sieves, the result
of some fortunate mutation in combination with the traits that were most
fi t for some environment. As we will see, the human nervous system
and human creative problem solving arose by the same evolutionary
mechanisms.
In the next chapter, I show how scenario visualization fi ts into the evolutionary
psychologist’s schematization of the mind to form a more complete
picture of how it is that humans evolved the ability to solve
vision-related problems creatively. In this chapter, I trace the evolution of
the visual system beginning with organisms that developed a light/dark
sensitivity area and culminating in the complex activities involved in an
aspect of conscious cognitive visual processing that I call scenario visualization.
I do this utilizing the anatomical evidence from fossils and living
species thought to be homologous to ancient species. I also use evidence
from ancient toolmaking techniques because, in my estimation, the evolution
of tool types parallels the evolution from noncognitive visual processing,
through cognitive visual processing, to scenario visualization, a form
of conscious cognitive visual processing (also see Arp, 2006, 2007a, 2008c).
The variety and complexity of tools discovered and dated by archeologists
offer compelling evidence that the brain and visual system have evolved
with the passage of time. Before tracing the evolution of the visual system,
I fi rst must say something about the general evolutionary principles of
genetic variability and natural selection.
As was noted in the last section of the previous chapter, neural development
is dependent upon genetic and environmental factors. Even though
neurulation follows a genetic blueprint, the way in which neurons differentiate,
localize, and ultimately perform depends upon the internal chemiconeural
environment of nervous system processes as well as the interaction
between the nervous system and the external environment. This neurobiological
process is representative of the general evolutionary pattern that all
processes of organisms follow. The evolutionary pattern consists of genetic variability and the natural selection of traits that are most fi t given a particular
environment.
Darwin’s (1859) insights concerning evolution—ones that still hold
today—are the following: (1) there is variation in organisms such that they
differ from each other in ways that are inherited; (2) there is a struggle or
competition for existence, since more organisms are born than can survive;
(3) there is a natural selection of the traits that are most fi t given a particular
environment; (4) organisms fortunate enough to have the variation in
traits that fi t a particular environment will have an increased chance of
surviving to pass those traits on to their progeny; and (5) natural selection
leads to the accumulation of favored variants, which may produce new
species or a segregated gene pool, given the right environmental conditions
and a certain amount of time.
Since Darwin’s time, we have been able to determine that a major source
of variation in organisms has to do with genetic mutation. A gene is a
functional segment of DNA located at a particular site on a chromosome
in the nucleus of all cells. Basically, DNA is the template from which RNA
copies are made that transmits genetic information concerning an organism’s
physical and behavioral traits (phenotypic traits) to synthesis sites in
the cytoplasm of the cell. RNA takes this information to ribosomes in a
cell where amino acids, and then proteins, are formed according to that
information. The proteins are the so-called building blocks of life, since they
ultimately determine the physical characteristics of organisms (Carroll,
2005; Audesirk et al., 2002; Strickberger, 1985, 2000; Dawkins, 1986; Mayr,
2001; Ruse, 2000; also see the relevant papers in Arp & Rosenberg, 2008;
Arp & Ayala, 2008).
DNA and RNA are composed of nucleic acids. These nucleic acids specify
the amino-acid sequences of all the proteins needed to make up the physical
characteristics of an organism, much like a code or cryptogram. This
code consists of specifi c sequences of nucleotides that are composed of a
sugar (deoxyribose in DNA, ribose in RNA), a phosphate group, and one
of four different nitrogen-containing bases, namely, adenine, guanine,
cytosine, and thymine in DNA (uracil replaces thymine in RNA). These
four bases are like a four-letter alphabet, and triplets of bases form threeletter
words or codons that identify an amino acid or signal a function.
There are 64 possible permutations of the four bases, and if one of the
nucleotides in a sequence is either deleted or substituted, or if an alternate
nucleotide is inserted, then a mutation is said to occur. A mutation is
nothing other than an alteration in the nucleotide sequence of a DNA or
RNA molecule. Mutations can result from a variety of environmental
The Evolution of the Visual System and Scenario Visualization 93
sources, including certain chemicals, radiation from X rays, and ultraviolet
rays in sunlight. Mutations also can occur spontaneously. However, the
most common source of mutations occurs regularly in base pairing during
replication, as a cell prepares for cell division. In other words, mutations
are occurring all of the time, since cell division is occurring in organisms
all of the time.
Now, the genetic makeup of an organism directly affects its phenotypic
characteristics. Whether an animal will have all of its limbs, or be stronger
than another member of its species, or look more appealing to the opposite
sex—all of these phenotypic characteristics are under genetic control
(Carroll, 2005; Strickberger, 1985, 2000; Mayr, 2001; Lewontin, 1992). The
examples of the manipulations of HOX genes that result in monstrous
animal forms I spoke about in the last section of the previous chapter
should make this point clear.
When an organism exists in a particular environment, the chance of it
being naturally selected to survive depends upon whether its genetic
makeup happened to have produced the phenotypic characteristics necessary
for optimal survival in that particular environment. To a certain
extent, the randomness of a mutation makes the business of life a “crapshoot.”
If your wolf genes coded you to have three legs instead of four,
then it is likely you will not survive in the wolf pack out in the forests of
Colorado. And if your rabbit genes coded you to have poor eyesight, then
it is likely you will not survive in the same forests of Colorado, where your
eyesight is essential for avoiding such packs of wolves. The phenotypic
effects of mutations need only be slight so that, for example, one wolf may
be just a little stronger, or a little faster, or a little more aggressive than
the rest of the pack. This small genotypic variation leads to a slight phenotypic
benefi t, giving the wolf an advantage in hunting, mating, and
passing its genes on to future generations.
Natural selection is a mechanism of evolution by which the environment
favors the reproductive success of individuals possessing desirable genetic
variants with greater phenotypic fi tness, increasing the chance that those
genotypes for the phenotypic traits will predominate in succeeding generations.
The evolutionary principles of genetic variation and the natural
selection of the traits most fi t in a particular environment are illustrated
in fi gure 4.1. This illustration owes its genesis to productive conversations
with my graduate school colleague at Saint Louis University, Kevin Decker,
as well as with biologists such as Robert Wood, at Saint Louis University,
and Charles Granger, at the University of Missouri—St. Louis. In this fi gure,
I try to show how natural selection acts like a sieve that allows for a certain phenotypic characteristic to pass through to a subsequent generation. The
various shapes represent organisms having certain phenotypic traits that
are genetically controlled. The sieves themselves (the rectangular planes)
represent the certain environments in which these organisms live. The
preformed slot or hole represents the optimal survival of organisms possessing
a desirable phenotypic trait in that particular environment.
The point of this illustration is to represent pictorially what biologists
such as Audesirk et al. (2002) and Berra (1990) have claimed about genetic
variability and natural selection. According to Audesirk et al. (2002, p. 175):
“Mutations are essential for evolution, because these random changes in
DNA sequence are the ultimate source of all genetic variation. New base
Figure 4.1
The evolutionary sieve
Generic Variants
Environment A:
The square was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
Environment B:
The rhombus was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
Environment C:
The triangle was
most fit of all the
generic variants.
sequences undergo natural selection as organisms compete to survive and
reproduce. Occasionally, a mutation proves benefi cial in the organism’s
interactions with its environment. The mutant base sequence may spread
throughout the population and become common as organisms that possess
it outcompete rivals that bear the original, unmutated base sequence.” In
Berra’s (1990, p. 8) words: “Some genetic variants will be better adapted to
their environment than others of their sort, and will therefore tend to
survive to maturity and to leave more offspring than will organisms with
less favorable variations. . . . The environment is the selecting agent, and
because the environment changes over time and from one region to
another, different variants will be selected under different environmental
conditions.”
Stated simply, the various species around us today are those organisms
that have made it through one of these environmental sieves, the result
of some fortunate mutation in combination with the traits that were most
fi t for some environment. As we will see, the human nervous system
and human creative problem solving arose by the same evolutionary
mechanisms.