THE METHODS OF SCIENCE 95

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

nothing in common save the absence of x, then x is the

cause of y.

 

If we subtract from a given effect all that is due to

certain causes, then the residue is the effect of the rest of

the causes. This is the fourth method "that of residues."

 

Fifthly, and lastly, if x and y increase, decrease, and vary

together, then one is the cause of the other or is closely

connected with such cause. This is called " the method

of concomitant variations."

 

Objection has been made to the validity of such reason-

ings on the ground that the universe is never the same in

all particulars save one, at any two successive instants,

and that two instances of any event or fact have never

occurred with only one circumstance in common. These

theoretical objections may also be urged not only against

the above " methods," but against all investigations by

experiment and observation.

 

The objection is no doubt formally correct. The

celestial bodies are never in the same position for two

successive instants, while, on the other hand, their exist-

ence persists through whatever series of experiments we

carry on.

 

In all cases also there are, and must be, both a multitude

of persistences and a multitude of changes, no one of which

we may ever become aware of. But although such theo-

retical inadequacies must be admitted to exist in every such

proof, they can in most cases be sufficiently well allowed

for, to serve all practical purposes.

 

The existences of the pleiades, or even of the mountains

in the moon, can be tranquilly ignored while we are trying

experiments with respect to the solidification of gases, nor

do the gavials of the Ganges interfere with careful investi-

gations into the development of the amphioxus or the

apteryx.

 

 

nothing in common save the absence of x, then x is the

cause of y.

 

If we subtract from a given effect all that is due to

certain causes, then the residue is the effect of the rest of

the causes. This is the fourth method "that of residues."

 

Fifthly, and lastly, if x and y increase, decrease, and vary

together, then one is the cause of the other or is closely

connected with such cause. This is called " the method

of concomitant variations."

 

Objection has been made to the validity of such reason-

ings on the ground that the universe is never the same in

all particulars save one, at any two successive instants,

and that two instances of any event or fact have never

occurred with only one circumstance in common. These

theoretical objections may also be urged not only against

the above " methods," but against all investigations by

experiment and observation.

 

The objection is no doubt formally correct. The

celestial bodies are never in the same position for two

successive instants, while, on the other hand, their exist-

ence persists through whatever series of experiments we

carry on.

 

In all cases also there are, and must be, both a multitude

of persistences and a multitude of changes, no one of which

we may ever become aware of. But although such theo-

retical inadequacies must be admitted to exist in every such

proof, they can in most cases be sufficiently well allowed

for, to serve all practical purposes.

 

The existences of the pleiades, or even of the mountains

in the moon, can be tranquilly ignored while we are trying

experiments with respect to the solidification of gases, nor

do the gavials of the Ganges interfere with careful investi-

gations into the development of the amphioxus or the

apteryx.