202 THE GROUNDWORK OF SCIENCE

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

Martha Obrecht * was deaf, dumb, and blind, and was

confided to the care of the nuns at a convent at Larnay

(Poictiers) when eight years old. Then, by intelligent and

patient instruction, she was enabled gradually to acquire the

power of apprehending and expressing intellectual concep-

tions, and highly abstract and lofty ideas, with distinct and

clear moral and religious notions. She was also taught not

only to read but also to write perfectly well.

 

When first received she was a living, almost inert, mass,

with no means of communicating with her fellow creatures,

though she emitted cries and made certain movements in

response to impressions she received. The first thing was

to give her some means of communication, and this was

done by making her touch different objects, and then

touching her in different ways appropriate to each object,

so that each mode of touching became a sign to her of that

object. Thus, when a piece of bread was given her, she was

made, as it were, to cut her left hand with her right. Very

soon when hungry she began to make that sign herself.

When she did anything wrong she was slightly pushed away,

and she thus soon learnt to push away from her things she

did not like ; and so little by little from one point to another

her intellectual development was slowly completed.

 

It may be, as it has been, objected to these facts that they

show no more than the influence on an infant of a long

line of ancestors all capable of speech. But, as we before

remarked, there could have been no inherited nervous

structure and conditions specially related to gesture -lan-

guage. Yet it was exclusively by gesture-language that the

latent intelligence of Martha Obrecht was developed.

 

Thus thought is evidently the cause, and not the effect,

of language.

 

* See Apologie Scientifique, by Canon F. DUILHE DE SAINT-PRQJET, Tou-

louse, 1885, pp. 374-3 8 7.

 

 

Martha Obrecht * was deaf, dumb, and blind, and was

confided to the care of the nuns at a convent at Larnay

(Poictiers) when eight years old. Then, by intelligent and

patient instruction, she was enabled gradually to acquire the

power of apprehending and expressing intellectual concep-

tions, and highly abstract and lofty ideas, with distinct and

clear moral and religious notions. She was also taught not

only to read but also to write perfectly well.

 

When first received she was a living, almost inert, mass,

with no means of communicating with her fellow creatures,

though she emitted cries and made certain movements in

response to impressions she received. The first thing was

to give her some means of communication, and this was

done by making her touch different objects, and then

touching her in different ways appropriate to each object,

so that each mode of touching became a sign to her of that

object. Thus, when a piece of bread was given her, she was

made, as it were, to cut her left hand with her right. Very

soon when hungry she began to make that sign herself.

When she did anything wrong she was slightly pushed away,

and she thus soon learnt to push away from her things she

did not like ; and so little by little from one point to another

her intellectual development was slowly completed.

 

It may be, as it has been, objected to these facts that they

show no more than the influence on an infant of a long

line of ancestors all capable of speech. But, as we before

remarked, there could have been no inherited nervous

structure and conditions specially related to gesture -lan-

guage. Yet it was exclusively by gesture-language that the

latent intelligence of Martha Obrecht was developed.

 

Thus thought is evidently the cause, and not the effect,

of language.

 

* See Apologie Scientifique, by Canon F. DUILHE DE SAINT-PRQJET, Tou-

louse, 1885, pp. 374-3 8 7.