LANGUAGE AND SCIENCE 193

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

We have quoted this passage as a typical example of

increasing unconscious exaggeration. A dozen ants in

proximity are first called "a sort of assembly." Now any

creatures which happen to come together in close proximity

may, in a certain vague sense, be said to assemble ; but the

word " assembly " implies more than that. This implication

is further intensified by the declaration that the ants

" appeared to be in consultation," though no fact in addition

to physical proximity is given as justifying such a purely

fanciful interpretation. Finally, the implication is driven

home by calling these physically approximated ants "a

conclave." If those who narrate things of this kind would

content themselves with accurately describing the facts they

witness, the gain would be great indeed.

 

Such an account has been given* by one careful observer,

Mr. G. Larden. He tells us of a small South American

species of ant which makes a large nest underground with a

network of paths converging to the nest. " These paths," he

says, " are of all lengths, from 10 yards up to 100 yards. As-

a general rule, one may say that streams of ants, carrying

leaves, buds, flowers, seeds, and other valuable odds and ends,

are always moving towards the nest, while empty-mouthed

ants are meeting and passing them on their outward journey

to the foraging grounds." He then tried the experiment of

turning sojne of these laden home-going carriers round, when

they had nearly reached home. "The general conclusion

I came to," he continues, " was that these ants did not then

understand in what direction the nest lay, nor did they (as

far as I could see) draw any conclusions from the fact that

they now met the stream of carriers with which they

had previously been travelling. Thus, one ant carrying a

(relatively) huge burden I reversed in direction when already

near the nest. I then followed it for about eight yards (or

 

* In Nature for May 29th, 1890, p. 115.

O

 

 

We have quoted this passage as a typical example of

increasing unconscious exaggeration. A dozen ants in

proximity are first called "a sort of assembly." Now any

creatures which happen to come together in close proximity

may, in a certain vague sense, be said to assemble ; but the

word " assembly " implies more than that. This implication

is further intensified by the declaration that the ants

" appeared to be in consultation," though no fact in addition

to physical proximity is given as justifying such a purely

fanciful interpretation. Finally, the implication is driven

home by calling these physically approximated ants "a

conclave." If those who narrate things of this kind would

content themselves with accurately describing the facts they

witness, the gain would be great indeed.

 

Such an account has been given* by one careful observer,

Mr. G. Larden. He tells us of a small South American

species of ant which makes a large nest underground with a

network of paths converging to the nest. " These paths," he

says, " are of all lengths, from 10 yards up to 100 yards. As-

a general rule, one may say that streams of ants, carrying

leaves, buds, flowers, seeds, and other valuable odds and ends,

are always moving towards the nest, while empty-mouthed

ants are meeting and passing them on their outward journey

to the foraging grounds." He then tried the experiment of

turning sojne of these laden home-going carriers round, when

they had nearly reached home. "The general conclusion

I came to," he continues, " was that these ants did not then

understand in what direction the nest lay, nor did they (as

far as I could see) draw any conclusions from the fact that

they now met the stream of carriers with which they

had previously been travelling. Thus, one ant carrying a

(relatively) huge burden I reversed in direction when already

near the nest. I then followed it for about eight yards (or

 

* In Nature for May 29th, 1890, p. 115.

O