3 8 THE GROUNDWORK OF
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 181 182 183 184 185 186
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339
340
something external to and independent of the mind which
supports all the ' qualities,' the existence of which the mind
recognizes, then Idealism may be accused of taking it away,
if one may be said to take away a thing which never has
been or can be perceived to exist or be even imagined so to
do. Far from inculcating any disbelief in the senses or in
what the senses tell us, Idealism attaches the very highest
value to the senses and to their teaching. It no more doubts
the existence of what is seen, heard, or felt, than it doubts
the existence of the mind which sees, hears, or feels.
Nothing, therefore, can be more absurd than the criticisms
of those persons who say that Idealists, to be consistent,
ought to run up against lamp-posts, fall into ditches, and
commit other similar absurdities. Idealism is not only a
thoroughly logical system, but also one quite in harmony with
every-day life, its perceptions and its duties. It is obvious
that we can never get outside ourselves, or feel the feelings of
anyone else. We can only know our own sensations and
ideas. The existence of these sensations and ideas is suffi-
cient to explain our whole experience, and we are not idly to
suppose that other things exist when such ' other things ' are
altogether superfluous for explaining any of the phenomena
we are or can become acquainted with. As we cannot know
anything beyond our own ideas, why should we affirm that
there is anything beyond them ? It is impossible for us to
even imagine anything existing unperceived. We cannot
imagine matter existing in the absence of mind, for in the
very act of imagining it we are compelled to imagine some-
one perceiving it. It is, of course, easy enough to imagine
trees in a park or books in a library, and nobody by to
perceive them. But so to do is only to form in the mind
certain ideas which we call books and trees, and at the same
time to omit to form the idea of anyone perceiving them.
But the person so imagining them must himself be thinking
something external to and independent of the mind which
supports all the ' qualities,' the existence of which the mind
recognizes, then Idealism may be accused of taking it away,
if one may be said to take away a thing which never has
been or can be perceived to exist or be even imagined so to
do. Far from inculcating any disbelief in the senses or in
what the senses tell us, Idealism attaches the very highest
value to the senses and to their teaching. It no more doubts
the existence of what is seen, heard, or felt, than it doubts
the existence of the mind which sees, hears, or feels.
Nothing, therefore, can be more absurd than the criticisms
of those persons who say that Idealists, to be consistent,
ought to run up against lamp-posts, fall into ditches, and
commit other similar absurdities. Idealism is not only a
thoroughly logical system, but also one quite in harmony with
every-day life, its perceptions and its duties. It is obvious
that we can never get outside ourselves, or feel the feelings of
anyone else. We can only know our own sensations and
ideas. The existence of these sensations and ideas is suffi-
cient to explain our whole experience, and we are not idly to
suppose that other things exist when such ' other things ' are
altogether superfluous for explaining any of the phenomena
we are or can become acquainted with. As we cannot know
anything beyond our own ideas, why should we affirm that
there is anything beyond them ? It is impossible for us to
even imagine anything existing unperceived. We cannot
imagine matter existing in the absence of mind, for in the
very act of imagining it we are compelled to imagine some-
one perceiving it. It is, of course, easy enough to imagine
trees in a park or books in a library, and nobody by to
perceive them. But so to do is only to form in the mind
certain ideas which we call books and trees, and at the same
time to omit to form the idea of anyone perceiving them.
But the person so imagining them must himself be thinking