THE OBJECTS OF SCIENCE 43
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 181 182 183 184 185 186
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339
340
Anyhow, we are convinced that the existence of a God
can only be known through a process of inference based
upon things and actions perceived; and it appears to us
a very illogical proceeding to affirm that objects cannot be
perceived save as related to a certain entity, which entity
itself cannot possibly be known to us except by the help
of objects not perceived as being so related.
Nevertheless (as we think), Idealism enshrines an im-
portant truth, namely, the truth that our apprehension of the
world about us is much less perfect and complete than is
often supposed. Our perceptive powers are inadequate to
supply us with a complete knowledge of nature, which, as
it appears to us, may be very different from what it might
appear to any intelligences higher than our own.
It is certain quite apart from any system of Idealism
that the material bodies about us (assuming that there are
such bodies) must possess powers and qualities which our
present senses are entirely unable to detect. Had we (as
before suggested) an organ of sense fitted to enable us to
apprehend "magnetism," as our eyes enable us to apprehend
" light," how modified might not the aspect of the world
become? We rejoice in the beauty of wild flowers and the
gay plumage of birds, some of which delight us with their
song ; yet, though we are not Idealists, we do not hesitate to
affirm that their colours and their notes are not by any
means just that which they seem to us to be. The most
startling and impressive lesson we have had in the present
century is that taught us by the Rontgen rays like light,
yet so different from it with such unexpected powers of
penetration, that wood is to them, as it were, translucent,
as the iron rod of a lightning conductor is for electricity
a tube down which it tumbles.
We may seem to have thus delivered ourselves up to the
Idealists with our hands bound ; yet such is by no means
Anyhow, we are convinced that the existence of a God
can only be known through a process of inference based
upon things and actions perceived; and it appears to us
a very illogical proceeding to affirm that objects cannot be
perceived save as related to a certain entity, which entity
itself cannot possibly be known to us except by the help
of objects not perceived as being so related.
Nevertheless (as we think), Idealism enshrines an im-
portant truth, namely, the truth that our apprehension of the
world about us is much less perfect and complete than is
often supposed. Our perceptive powers are inadequate to
supply us with a complete knowledge of nature, which, as
it appears to us, may be very different from what it might
appear to any intelligences higher than our own.
It is certain quite apart from any system of Idealism
that the material bodies about us (assuming that there are
such bodies) must possess powers and qualities which our
present senses are entirely unable to detect. Had we (as
before suggested) an organ of sense fitted to enable us to
apprehend "magnetism," as our eyes enable us to apprehend
" light," how modified might not the aspect of the world
become? We rejoice in the beauty of wild flowers and the
gay plumage of birds, some of which delight us with their
song ; yet, though we are not Idealists, we do not hesitate to
affirm that their colours and their notes are not by any
means just that which they seem to us to be. The most
startling and impressive lesson we have had in the present
century is that taught us by the Rontgen rays like light,
yet so different from it with such unexpected powers of
penetration, that wood is to them, as it were, translucent,
as the iron rod of a lightning conductor is for electricity
a tube down which it tumbles.
We may seem to have thus delivered ourselves up to the
Idealists with our hands bound ; yet such is by no means