LANGUAGE AND SCIENCE 211
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 181 182 183 184 185 186
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339
340
with respect to the origin of human speech. In the absence
of all direct evidence only more or less plausible hypotheses
are possible. One thing, however, we regard as quite certain,
and that is that thought, the verbum mentale, was anterior
to the verbum oris. The phenomena presented by deaf-
mutes are sufficient to show that abstract ideas can exist
without spoken words, and that oral terms are the conse-
quence of thought, ordinary experience suffices to prove.
When, in the cultivation of any new science or art, newly-
observed facts or newly -devised processes give rise to new
conceptions, new terms are invented to give expression to
such conceptions. Thus new words arise as a consequent,
and not as an antecedent, of such 'intellectual action. New
terms are always fitted to fresh ideas, and not fresh ideas
to new terms. Whoever attentively follows the mental
development of a child, will see that in it also, notions are
formed spontaneously, and often give rise to new words
of the child's own coining.
The antecedence of thought is also shown by the
wonderful rapidity far exceeding the rapidity of speech
with which the mind may detect a fallacy in an argument
And such detection is always due to some reason our mind
perceives to be fatal, it may be, to a long chain of reasoning.
A mere cry or gesture of negation may be the sign of
intellectual perceptions which would require more than one
sentence to fully express, but which are perceived too
rapidly for even the mental repetition of the words of such
sentences.
We have seen how deaf-mutes may spontaneously evolve
a gesture-language, through which they can convey ideas
to one another. Dr. W. W. Ireland has recorded* the
case of a boy who could not speak ordinary words, and
yet had invented a few of his own, to which he attached
Idiocy and Imbecility, p. 276. Churchill, 1877.
with respect to the origin of human speech. In the absence
of all direct evidence only more or less plausible hypotheses
are possible. One thing, however, we regard as quite certain,
and that is that thought, the verbum mentale, was anterior
to the verbum oris. The phenomena presented by deaf-
mutes are sufficient to show that abstract ideas can exist
without spoken words, and that oral terms are the conse-
quence of thought, ordinary experience suffices to prove.
When, in the cultivation of any new science or art, newly-
observed facts or newly -devised processes give rise to new
conceptions, new terms are invented to give expression to
such conceptions. Thus new words arise as a consequent,
and not as an antecedent, of such 'intellectual action. New
terms are always fitted to fresh ideas, and not fresh ideas
to new terms. Whoever attentively follows the mental
development of a child, will see that in it also, notions are
formed spontaneously, and often give rise to new words
of the child's own coining.
The antecedence of thought is also shown by the
wonderful rapidity far exceeding the rapidity of speech
with which the mind may detect a fallacy in an argument
And such detection is always due to some reason our mind
perceives to be fatal, it may be, to a long chain of reasoning.
A mere cry or gesture of negation may be the sign of
intellectual perceptions which would require more than one
sentence to fully express, but which are perceived too
rapidly for even the mental repetition of the words of such
sentences.
We have seen how deaf-mutes may spontaneously evolve
a gesture-language, through which they can convey ideas
to one another. Dr. W. W. Ireland has recorded* the
case of a boy who could not speak ordinary words, and
yet had invented a few of his own, to which he attached
Idiocy and Imbecility, p. 276. Churchill, 1877.