NATURE OF THE GROUNDWORK OF SCIENCE 307

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

imagine nothing except ^vhat our senses have previously

experienced either as a whole or in its constituent parts.

This close connexion between experience and imagination

has for its consequence the following law of association :

 

Facts of experience are reproduced in our imagination

with the greater ease and readiness the more frequently

or continuously they have been experienced by us.

 

But we have just seen* how movements of solid bodies

constitute the most constant and universal of all our

experiences. What wonder, then, that a sense of ease and

pleasurable relief should be felt whenever difficult and

puzzling phenomena of any kind can be presented to the

intellect in terms and by the aid of mental images of

moving solid bodies.

 

It should also be recollected that few things are more

familiar to us than the experience that objects of considerable

size can mostly be broken, cut, or crushed by us into smaller

portions, and these again similarly further subdivided. It

is a most common experience also to see substances crushed

into very small particles (sand, dust, or what not) particles so

small that we are unable to subdivide them any further.

Hence a vague feeling can be produced of a distinctness

in nature between large bodies we can subdivide and

possessing obvious qualities, and minute particles which we

cannot so act upon, and of which we can detect hardly any

qualities particles only just within the range of our vision.

In this way an imagination easily and spontaneously arises

of large bodies being made up of minute solid particles

incapable of smaller subdivision which, by their union and

coherence, compose such bodies.

 

Through a combination of these multitudinous and con-

tinual experiences, the tendency has arisen (probably ages

before Democritus), still exists, and will, most likely, ever

 

* See ante, p. 302.

 

 

imagine nothing except ^vhat our senses have previously

experienced either as a whole or in its constituent parts.

This close connexion between experience and imagination

has for its consequence the following law of association :

 

Facts of experience are reproduced in our imagination

with the greater ease and readiness the more frequently

or continuously they have been experienced by us.

 

But we have just seen* how movements of solid bodies

constitute the most constant and universal of all our

experiences. What wonder, then, that a sense of ease and

pleasurable relief should be felt whenever difficult and

puzzling phenomena of any kind can be presented to the

intellect in terms and by the aid of mental images of

moving solid bodies.

 

It should also be recollected that few things are more

familiar to us than the experience that objects of considerable

size can mostly be broken, cut, or crushed by us into smaller

portions, and these again similarly further subdivided. It

is a most common experience also to see substances crushed

into very small particles (sand, dust, or what not) particles so

small that we are unable to subdivide them any further.

Hence a vague feeling can be produced of a distinctness

in nature between large bodies we can subdivide and

possessing obvious qualities, and minute particles which we

cannot so act upon, and of which we can detect hardly any

qualities particles only just within the range of our vision.

In this way an imagination easily and spontaneously arises

of large bodies being made up of minute solid particles

incapable of smaller subdivision which, by their union and

coherence, compose such bodies.

 

Through a combination of these multitudinous and con-

tinual experiences, the tendency has arisen (probably ages

before Democritus), still exists, and will, most likely, ever

 

* See ante, p. 302.