29 2 THE GROUNDWORK OF SCIENCE

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

in its various parts. It could never have had the form of

one universally diffused and everywhere similar substance,

unless it had been acted on from without by something

external to itself. The attribute of instability applied to

the conception of a homogeneous universe could not, as

has been most absurdly supposed, account for the develop-

ment of the universe from a primitively simple condition.

The term " instability " is a mere abstract term denoting

the quality, as such, of what is unstable. But whatever is

unstable is not thereby endowed with any active power ;

it is merely easily upset and disturbed by anything external

to it. Anything quite homogeneous might be unstable to

the most extreme degree possible, and yet remain absolutely

unchanged for ever if nothing external ever came to act

upon it. It must be an action from without, since in a

universe absolutely homogeneous no possible change could

ever take place from within. For whatever is thus homo-

geneous must be everywhere identical in the mode of its

being and activity, and therefore could never change of

itself unless it were pervaded by some existence really-

distinct from it, change produced by which, though

materially an action from within, would be essentially an

action from without namely, the action of something

distinct from and external to it in nature and being.

 

One most important consequence follows from the fact

that the universe is necessarily one. Since the universe

embraces all we know now or can conceive of as hereafter to

be discovered, it is all-embracing. Were it not this, it could

not be the universe.

 

Now, since the universe is thus one, it could never itself

have been evolved by any process of " Natural Selection." An

eternal universe could never have been naturally selected

that is, have proved itself, through competition, to have been

a universe able to survive others, since it never could have

 

 

in its various parts. It could never have had the form of

one universally diffused and everywhere similar substance,

unless it had been acted on from without by something

external to itself. The attribute of instability applied to

the conception of a homogeneous universe could not, as

has been most absurdly supposed, account for the develop-

ment of the universe from a primitively simple condition.

The term " instability " is a mere abstract term denoting

the quality, as such, of what is unstable. But whatever is

unstable is not thereby endowed with any active power ;

it is merely easily upset and disturbed by anything external

to it. Anything quite homogeneous might be unstable to

the most extreme degree possible, and yet remain absolutely

unchanged for ever if nothing external ever came to act

upon it. It must be an action from without, since in a

universe absolutely homogeneous no possible change could

ever take place from within. For whatever is thus homo-

geneous must be everywhere identical in the mode of its

being and activity, and therefore could never change of

itself unless it were pervaded by some existence really-

distinct from it, change produced by which, though

materially an action from within, would be essentially an

action from without namely, the action of something

distinct from and external to it in nature and being.

 

One most important consequence follows from the fact

that the universe is necessarily one. Since the universe

embraces all we know now or can conceive of as hereafter to

be discovered, it is all-embracing. Were it not this, it could

not be the universe.

 

Now, since the universe is thus one, it could never itself

have been evolved by any process of " Natural Selection." An

eternal universe could never have been naturally selected

that is, have proved itself, through competition, to have been

a universe able to survive others, since it never could have