271

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

must be due to the development of new positive characters

which distinguish it from other species ; the action of nature

can be but that of a pruning knife applied to the sprouting

tree of organic life.

 

This, of course, Darwin well knew, and he never for a

moment pretended (as some of his opponents have very

unjustly and foolishly represented that he did pretend) that

(; Natural Selection " could account for, or produce, the

variations upon the occurrence of which the origin of every

new species must absolutely depend.

 

But Mr. Darwin was most exceptionally fortunate in the

character of his hypothesis, for it was of such a nature as

to be almost incapable of disproof. Having taken up the

position that every characteristic of a species exists through

its utility to that species, and that it may be assumed to have

so originated unless proof to the contrary can be given, his

opponent was thereby reduced to sore straits indeed, and it

would be similar even if we knew, from some infallible source,

that the hypothesis was a false one.

 

For its opponent would have to show that minute, hap-

hazard variations in all directions in all the organs of every

species, were impossible or did not take place ; he would also

have to show that there were structures or functions possessed

by some species which were not only of no use to it now,

but could never have been of any use to any of its ancestors

at any period of the world's history, or, under any possible

conditions, no use to even any hypothetical ancestor which an

advocate of " Natural Selection " can suggest may have

existed under conditions widely divergent from those which

form the present environment of the species in question.

A disciple of Mr. Darwin can also always say : " It is very

true that this or that character could not have been produced

by " Natural Selection " directly, but it may have been

produced by it indirectly, for you cannot deny that it may

 

 

must be due to the development of new positive characters

which distinguish it from other species ; the action of nature

can be but that of a pruning knife applied to the sprouting

tree of organic life.

 

This, of course, Darwin well knew, and he never for a

moment pretended (as some of his opponents have very

unjustly and foolishly represented that he did pretend) that

(; Natural Selection " could account for, or produce, the

variations upon the occurrence of which the origin of every

new species must absolutely depend.

 

But Mr. Darwin was most exceptionally fortunate in the

character of his hypothesis, for it was of such a nature as

to be almost incapable of disproof. Having taken up the

position that every characteristic of a species exists through

its utility to that species, and that it may be assumed to have

so originated unless proof to the contrary can be given, his

opponent was thereby reduced to sore straits indeed, and it

would be similar even if we knew, from some infallible source,

that the hypothesis was a false one.

 

For its opponent would have to show that minute, hap-

hazard variations in all directions in all the organs of every

species, were impossible or did not take place ; he would also

have to show that there were structures or functions possessed

by some species which were not only of no use to it now,

but could never have been of any use to any of its ancestors

at any period of the world's history, or, under any possible

conditions, no use to even any hypothetical ancestor which an

advocate of " Natural Selection " can suggest may have

existed under conditions widely divergent from those which

form the present environment of the species in question.

A disciple of Mr. Darwin can also always say : " It is very

true that this or that character could not have been produced

by " Natural Selection " directly, but it may have been

produced by it indirectly, for you cannot deny that it may