2 8o THE GROUNDWORK OF SCIENCE

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

kind or another. It must have certain qualities and charac-

ters be they what they may. Let us conceive of the most

attenuated and amorphous nebula we can ; it must yet be

quite definite. It must have some composition, some

characters of cohesion and possible resistance, some limits

as to size, and some shape, change as it may from instant

to instant. In reality it is as definite a thing as a plum-

pudding, and it is nothing but a trick of the imagination

which may make it seem not to be so. Less easily perceived

by our sense-organs, and therefore less easy to imagine and

less easy to describe, it certainly is. But less " definite " it no

less certainly is not.

 

Here then, at the very base, or the very starting-point, of

Mr. Spencer's whole philosophy, lies an absurdity so pro-

found as necessarily to destroy the philosophical value of the

entire system based upon it. And his system agrees with

that " levelling down " method of treating human intelligence

which now demands our attention. We need, however,

occupy but little space here or little of our reader's attention,

if he is already convinced that self-evidence, as recognized

by the intellect, is the supreme and ultimate criterion of the

truth of those propositions which lie at the base of all our

"ordered knowledge" i.e., of all science.

 

The process of " levelling down " seeks to explain our

highest faculties by our lowest, and to make not intellect but

sense the criterion of our judgments. After what we have

before pointed out, we think it needless to further criticise

that fundamental error which forms a main part of the

system of philosophy which underlies the system known

as Darwinism. Its result, for those who are so unfortunate

as not to have forced their way through it, is to hide from

their intellectual eyesight the objective truth of these

principles which are logically necessary for all science,*

 

* See ante, Chapter IV.

 

 

kind or another. It must have certain qualities and charac-

ters be they what they may. Let us conceive of the most

attenuated and amorphous nebula we can ; it must yet be

quite definite. It must have some composition, some

characters of cohesion and possible resistance, some limits

as to size, and some shape, change as it may from instant

to instant. In reality it is as definite a thing as a plum-

pudding, and it is nothing but a trick of the imagination

which may make it seem not to be so. Less easily perceived

by our sense-organs, and therefore less easy to imagine and

less easy to describe, it certainly is. But less " definite " it no

less certainly is not.

 

Here then, at the very base, or the very starting-point, of

Mr. Spencer's whole philosophy, lies an absurdity so pro-

found as necessarily to destroy the philosophical value of the

entire system based upon it. And his system agrees with

that " levelling down " method of treating human intelligence

which now demands our attention. We need, however,

occupy but little space here or little of our reader's attention,

if he is already convinced that self-evidence, as recognized

by the intellect, is the supreme and ultimate criterion of the

truth of those propositions which lie at the base of all our

"ordered knowledge" i.e., of all science.

 

The process of " levelling down " seeks to explain our

highest faculties by our lowest, and to make not intellect but

sense the criterion of our judgments. After what we have

before pointed out, we think it needless to further criticise

that fundamental error which forms a main part of the

system of philosophy which underlies the system known

as Darwinism. Its result, for those who are so unfortunate

as not to have forced their way through it, is to hide from

their intellectual eyesight the objective truth of these

principles which are logically necessary for all science,*

 

* See ante, Chapter IV.