CAUSES OF SCIENTIFIC KXOU'LEDGE 273

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

has been due to what we must call chance that is, not to

any rational cause. The essence of the hypothesis is the

origin of species by the fortuitous action of the destructive

forces of nature on individuals which differ by innate,

indefinite, haphazard variations in all directions. Purposeless

energy is conceived as the cause of the variations, and the

selection of certain kinds is also conceived of as due to

the chance action of physical forces and of other organisms.

By this expression we mean, of course, that the cause of

variation is thus deemed to be not only unknown, but to be

due to no definite law which is the outcome of any kind or

sort of intelligent energy. By this system, then, unreason

may be regarded as practically lord of the universe, and

the source of all the beauties and harmonies which exist in

organic nature.

 

The above philosophical conception, which underlies the

Darwinian theory, has a very distinct though indirect bear-

ing on Epistemology, as we shall see later on.

 

We must now return to the consideration of the asserted

genesis by " Natural Selection " of the inevitable character

of our perceptions of an external, extended world. The

main answer to this objection is the answer which we shall

shortly give to all the theories concerning the origin of

human knowledge. It consists in pointing out that what

is supremely important is not the origin of knowledge but

the grounds of knowledge the reasons why it should and

must be confided in and trusted. It is strange that so many

persons should be blind to this fact, which, in our eyes, is

so obvious a truth.

 

But, putting aside for the present this reply, let us con-

sider whether we possess any knowledge which could not

have been due to the action of "Natural Selection" upon

minute variations in the clearness and extent of our per-

ceptions.

 

 

has been due to what we must call chance that is, not to

any rational cause. The essence of the hypothesis is the

origin of species by the fortuitous action of the destructive

forces of nature on individuals which differ by innate,

indefinite, haphazard variations in all directions. Purposeless

energy is conceived as the cause of the variations, and the

selection of certain kinds is also conceived of as due to

the chance action of physical forces and of other organisms.

By this expression we mean, of course, that the cause of

variation is thus deemed to be not only unknown, but to be

due to no definite law which is the outcome of any kind or

sort of intelligent energy. By this system, then, unreason

may be regarded as practically lord of the universe, and

the source of all the beauties and harmonies which exist in

organic nature.

 

The above philosophical conception, which underlies the

Darwinian theory, has a very distinct though indirect bear-

ing on Epistemology, as we shall see later on.

 

We must now return to the consideration of the asserted

genesis by " Natural Selection " of the inevitable character

of our perceptions of an external, extended world. The

main answer to this objection is the answer which we shall

shortly give to all the theories concerning the origin of

human knowledge. It consists in pointing out that what

is supremely important is not the origin of knowledge but

the grounds of knowledge the reasons why it should and

must be confided in and trusted. It is strange that so many

persons should be blind to this fact, which, in our eyes, is

so obvious a truth.

 

But, putting aside for the present this reply, let us con-

sider whether we possess any knowledge which could not

have been due to the action of "Natural Selection" upon

minute variations in the clearness and extent of our per-

ceptions.